As of August 2024, International Journal "Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets" is being indexed in Scopus.
Please check our Instructions to Authors and send your manuscripts to nifs.journal@gmail.com. Next issue: September/October 2024.

Open Call for Papers: International Workshop on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets • 13 December 2024 • Banska Bystrica, Slovakia/ online (hybrid mode).
Deadline for submissions: 16 November 2024.

Issue:Reengineering frameworks: Issues for fuzzy modeling

From Ifigenia, the wiki for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and generalized nets
Jump to navigation Jump to search
shortcut
http://ifigenia.org/wiki/issue:nifs/4/3/65-73
Title of paper: Reengineering frameworks: Issues for fuzzy modeling
Author(s):
Cecilia Temponi
Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666
ct01@swt.edu
Published in: "Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets", Volume 4 (1998) Number 3, pages 65—73
Download:  PDF (6208  Kb, File info)
Abstract: Reengineering is the fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business process to achieve dramatic improvements in cost, quality, service, and speed. The qualitative nature of information related to reengineering is better expressed with words and ideally its risks should be assessed through natural language. In this research, we selected critical managerial reengineering issues from the literature-and develop parallels between reengineering and fuzzy systems. Since reengineering costs and risks are high and success is not always attainable, we identified key issues for the development of fuzzy models that may assist managers in determining organizational readiness level for reengineering initiatives.


References:
  1. Bashein, B. J., M. Lynne Markus and Patricia Riley. Business Process Reengineering: What Does the Literature Says? WP2-93, August 1993.
  2. Bashein, B. J., M. Lynne Markus, and Patricia Riley. Preconditions for BPR Success and How to Prevent Failures, Information System Management, WP 03-94, Spring 1994.
  3. Brooks, S. S. Re-engineering: Pitfalls and Potential in a Single Package. Management Police and Personnel Law, 4(3): 1-8, 1995.
  4. Cameron, K., Freeman, S. and Mishra, A. Best practices in white-collar downsizing: managing contradictions, Academy of Management Executive, 5(3): 57-73, 1991.
  5. Caron, R. J., Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, and Donna B. Stoddard. Business Reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: Experiences and Lessons Learned From the First Five Years. MIS Quarterly, 233-250, September 1994.
  6. Casio, W. F. Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? Academy of Management Executive, 7(1): 95-104, 1993.
  7. Champy, J. Reengineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership, Harper-Collins Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, 1995.
  8. Deloitte & Touche LLP and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International. Reengineering for Results. Connecticut, 1996.
  9. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, 1993.
  10. Hisdal, E. The philosophical issues raiscd by fuzzy set theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 25(3): 349-367, 1988.
  11. Kangari, R. Construction Risk Assessment by Linguistics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2): 126-131, May 1989.
  12. Klir, G., and Bo Yuan. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Prentice-Hall Inc., 1995.
  13. Knorr, R. O. Business Process Redesign: Key to Competitiveness. The Journal of Business Strategy, 48-51, November/December 1991.
  14. Korchinsky, M. Is Reengineering still Relevant?: Yes! Computerworld, 95-96, April 1997.
  15. Lee, Y. and Amie Elcan. Simulation Modeling for Process Reengineering in the Telecommunications Industry. Interfaces, 1-9, May-June 1996.
  16. Liang, G. and Mao-Jiun Wang. Personnel Selection Using Fuzzy MCDM Algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 22-23, 1994.
  17. Liu, C. and Mao-Jiun Wang. A Multiple Criteria Linguistic Decision Model (MCLD-M) for Human Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research,76, 466-485, 1994.
  18. Macdonald, K Hugh. Business Strategy Development, Alignment, and Redesign. The Corporation of the 1990s: Inf. Technology and Organizational Transformation, 159-186. Michael S. Scott Morton, Editor. New York, NY, Oxford University Press.
  19. Markus, L. M. and Daniel Robey, Business Process Reengineering and The Role of the Information Systems Professional. Programs in Information Science — The Claremont Business School. WP 02- 95 Chapter 22, 591-611.
  20. Repic, E. Why reengineering fails. Engineering Management Journal, 6(4): 6, 1994.
  21. Temponi, C. Convergency of Fuzzy Systems and Enterprise Modeling. Advances in Systems Science and Applications, 358-364, 1997.
  22. Temponi, C. and Cynthia Harris. Overview of Fuzzy Systems in Reengineering. Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 110-114, August 20, 1998.
  23. Tomsho, R. How Greyhound lines re-engineered itself right into a deep hole. Wall Street Journal, Al, A4, October 20, 1994.
  24. Whiting, J.T. Reengineering the corporation: A historical perspective and critique. Industrial Management, 14-16, November/December 1994.
  25. Zadeh L.A. The Linguistic Approach and Its Applications to Decision Analysis. Selected Papers by Lotfi Zadeh, 260-361, 1976.
  26. Zadeh, L. A., Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes. [EEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-3, no. 1, 28-44, January 1973.
  27. Zadeh, L. A. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Applications to Approximate Reasoning- I. Information Sciences, 8, 199-249, 1975.
  28. Zadeh, L. A. Soft Computing and Fuzzy Logic. IEEE Software, 48-56, November 1994.
  29. Atanassov K., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and Systems Vol. 20 (1986), No. 1, 87-96.
Citations:

The list of publications, citing this article may be empty or incomplete. If you can provide relevant data, please, write on the talk page.