Issue:On liberal collective identity

shortcut

http://ifigenia.org/wiki/issue:nifs/6/2/42-51

Title of paper: On liberal collective identity Author(s): Dinko Dimitrov Graduate College ” Allocation Theory, Economic Policy, and Collective Decisions”, Ruhr-University Bochum / University Dortmund Published in: "Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets", Volume 6 (2000) Number 2, pages 42—51 Download:  PDF (7767  Kb, File info) Abstract: Suppose that each member of a society has a view about every individual, including himself, whether or not this individual is a member of some social subgroup J. A Collective Identity Function (CIF) assigns a collective meaning to the question "Who is a J?" for each profile of individual opinions. By the Liberal CIF (LCIF) an individual is collective identified as a J if and only if his answer to the question "Am I a J?” is positive. In this note we study a situation where the individuals in the society have intuitionistic fuzzy views about each other, i.e. they can use all numbers between 0 and 1 in order to give a characterization of themselves. We follow Kasher and Rubinstein (1998) and extend their axiomatic characterization of the LCIF to our general environment. References: Atanassov, K. (1999) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Physica-Verlag. Atanassov, K. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 87-96. Kasher, A., Rubinstein, A. (1998) On the Question "Who is a J?": A Social Choice Approach, Logique et Analyse, forthcoming. Samet, D., Schmeidler, D. (2000) Between Liberalism and Democracy, Working Paper, Ohio State University. Sen, A. (1970) The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal, Journal of Political Economy 78, 152-157. Zadeh, L. (1965) Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control 8, 338-353. Citations: Issue:On intuitionistic fuzzy consent rules ‎ (← links) The list of publications, citing this article may be empty or incomplete. If you can provide relevant data, please, write on the talk page.