As of June 2025, International Journal "Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets" has been assigned SJR = 0.258 and Scopus quartile Q3.
Please check our Instructions to Authors and send your manuscripts to nifs.journal@gmail.com.

Open Call for Papers: 29th International Conference on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets • 6–7 November 2026 • Sofia, Bulgaria / Online
Deadline for submissions: 15 May 2026.

Issue:Rational divergence measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets

From Ifigenia, the wiki for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and generalized nets
(Redirected from Issue:Nifs/32/1/68-87)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
shortcut
http://ifigenia.org/wiki/issue:nifs/32/1/68-87
Title of paper: Rational divergence measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Author(s):
Vladimír Kobza     0000-0002-2466-5563
Department of Mathematics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Tajovského 40, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
vladimir.kobza@umb.sk
Published in: Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Volume 32 (2026), Number 1, pages 68–87
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7546/nifs.32.1.68-87
Download:  PDF (256  Kb, File info)
Abstract: This paper investigates the theoretical foundations and practical applications of rational divergence measures within the framework of fuzzy set theory. Unlike traditional distance metrics, rational divergence measures are characterized by their functional form, typically expressed as a ratio of membership functions or set cardinalities, which allows for a more nuanced quantification of the "informational gap" between fuzzy sets.

The study explores the axiomatic properties of these measures, focusing on their ability to handle non-linearity and uncertainty in complex data structures. By examining rational forms of divergence, such as those derived from the Jaccard-like ratios or specialized f-divergences, this work demonstrates how these measures overcome the limitations of standard Euclidean distances in high-dimensional fuzzy spaces. Key emphasis is placed on their role in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and pattern recognition, where the rational expression of divergence provides a more stable and intuitive measure of dissimilarity.

Furthermore, the paper provides a comparative analysis of different rational divergence formulations, evaluating their sensitivity to membership fluctuations and their performance in clustering algorithms. The results suggest that rational divergence measures offer superior discriminative power, making them a tool for modeling expert knowledge and imprecise information in modern intelligent systems.

Many authors investigated the possibilities how two fuzzy sets can be compared. The basic study of fuzzy sets theory was introduced by Lotfi Zadeh in 1965. We discuss the divergences defined on more general objects, namely intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs). We have focused on special class of divergences, since some restriction conditions are necessary. This approach to the divergence measure is motivated by class of the rational similarity measures between fuzzy subsets expressed using some set operations (namely intersection, complement, difference, and symmetric difference) and their scalar cardinalities. In this study, we have considered the value of divergence between IFSs as a Σ-count of two scalar cardinalities, i.e. as a pair of real numbers.

Keywords: Intuitionistic fuzzy set, Divergence measure, Local property, Rational similarity measure.
AMS Classification: 03B52.
References:
  1. Anthony, M., & Hammer, P. L. (2006). A Boolean measure of similarity. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 154(16), 2242–2246.
  2. Ashraf, S., & Rashid, T. (2010). Fuzzy Similarity Measures. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
  3. Atanassov, K. T. (1983). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. VII ITKR Session, Sofia, 20-23 June 1983 (Deposed in Centr. Sci.-Techn. Library of the Bulg. Acad. of Sci., 1697/84) (in Bulgarian). Reprinted in: Int. J. Bioautomation, 2016, 20(S1), S1–S6. (in English).
  4. Bouchon-Meunier, B., Rifqi, M., & Bothorel, S. (1996). Towards general measures of comparison of objects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84, 143–153.
  5. Couso, I., Garrido, L., & Sanchez, L. (2013). Similarity and dissimilarity measures between fuzzy sets: A formal relational study. Information Sciences, 229, 122–141.
  6. De Baets, B., De Meyer, H., & Naessens, H. (2001). A class of rational cardinality-based similarity measures. The Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 132, 51–69.
  7. De Baets, B., Janssens, S., & De Meyer, H. (2009). On the transitivity of a parametric family of cardinality-based similarity measures. Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50, 104–116.
  8. De Luca, A., & Termini, S. (1972). A definition of a non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of Fuzzy Set Theory. Information and Control, 20, 301–312.
  9. Kobza, V. (2017). Divergence measure between fuzzy sets using cardinality. Kybernetika, 53(3), 418–436.
  10. Kobza, V. (2022). Divergence measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 28(4), 413–427.
  11. Kobza, V., Janis, V. & Montes, S. (2017). Generalizated local divergence measures. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33, 337–350.
  12. Lui, X. (1992). Entropy, distance measure and similarity measure of fuzzy sets and their relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 52, 305–318.
  13. Montes, S. (1998). Partitions and Divergence Measures in Fuzzy Models. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oviedo, Spain].
  14. Montes, S., Couso, I., Gil, P. & Bertoluzza, C. (2002). Divergence measure between fuzzy sets. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 30, 91–105.
  15. Papakostas, G. A., Hatzimichailidis, A. G. & Kaburlasos, V. G. (2013). Distance and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets: A comparative analysis from a pattern recognition point of view. Pattern Recognition Letters, 34(14), 1609–1622.
  16. Szmidt, E. & Kacprzyk, J. (2000). Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(3), 505–518.
  17. Szmidt, E. (2014). Distances and Similarities in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 307, Springer, Cham.
  18. Wang, W. & Xin, X. (2005). Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 2063–2069.
  19. Xu, Z. & Xia, M. (2011). Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 181, 2128–2138.
  20. Zadeh, L. (2014). A note on similarity-based definitions of possibility and probability. Information Sciences, 267, 334–336.
  21. Zhang, C. & Fu, H. (2006). Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(2), 1307–1317.
Citations:

The list of publications, citing this article may be empty or incomplete. If you can provide relevant data, please, write on the talk page.