Title of paper:
|
Comparison study based on the divergence measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and some applications
|
Author(s):
|
Vladimír Kobza
|
Department of Mathematics, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 40, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
|
vladimir.kobza@umb.sk
|
|
Published in:
|
Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Volume 30 (2024), Number 4, pages 333–348
|
DOI:
|
https://doi.org/10.7546/nifs.2024.30.4.333-348
|
Download:
|
PDF (229 Kb, File info)
|
Abstract:
|
Many authors investigated possibilities how two fuzzy sets can be compared. The basic study of fuzzy sets theory was introduced by Lotfi Zadeh in 1965. The previous approach to the dissimilarities is too restrictive, because it assumes the inclusion relation between fuzzy sets and many pairs of fuzzy sets are incomparable to each other with respect to this relation. Therefore we need new concept for measuring - divergence measures. We discuss the divergences defined on more general objects, namely intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs). We have focused on some applications of this concept to pattern recognition and to decision making. In both cases, we present an illustrative example.
|
Keywords:
|
Intuitionistic fuzzy set, Divergence measure, Applications, Pattern recognition, Decision making.
|
AMS Classification:
|
03B52.
|
References:
|
- Anthony, M., & Hammer, P. L. (2006). A Boolean measure of similarity. In: Discrete Applied Mathematics, 154(16), 2242–2246.
- Atanassov, K. T. (1983). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. VII ITKR Session, Sofia, 20-23 June 1983 (Deposed in Centr. Sci.-Techn. Library of the Bulg. Acad. of Sci., 1697/84) (in Bulgarian). Reprinted in: Int. J. Bioautomation, 2016, 20(S1), S1–S6. (in English).
- Bouchon-Meunier, B., Rifqi, M., & Bothorel, S. (1996). Towards general measures of comparison of objects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84, 143–153.
- Couso, I., Garrido, L., & Sanchez, L. (2013). Similarity and dissimilarity measures between fuzzy sets: A formal relational study. Information Sciences, 229, 122–141.
- Kobza, V. (2022). Divergence measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 28(4), 413–427.
- Kobza, V., Janis, V., & Montes, S. (2017). Generalizated local divergence measures. ˇ Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33, 337–350.
- Lui, X. (1992). Entropy, distance measure and similarity measure of fuzzy sets and their relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 52, 305–318.
- Montes, S. (1998). Partitions and divergence measures in fuzzy models. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oviedo, Spain].
- Montes, S., Couso, I., Gil, P., & Bertoluzza, C. (2002). Divergence measure between fuzzy sets. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 30, 91–105.
- Papakostas, G. A., Hatzimichailidis, A. G., & Kaburlasos, V. G. (2013). Distance and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets: A comparative analysis from a pattern recognition point of view. Pattern Recognition Letters, 34(14), 1609–1622.
- Szmidt, E. (2014). Distances and Similarities in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. “Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing”, Vol. 307, Springer.
- Wang, W., & Xin, X. (2005). Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 2063–2069.
- Xu, Z., & Xia, M. (2011). Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 181, 2128–2138.
- Zadeh, L. (2014). A note on similarity-based definitions of possibility and probability. Information Sciences, 267, 334–336.
- Zhang, C., & Fu, H. (2006). Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(2), 1307–1317.
|
Citations:
|
The list of publications, citing this article may be empty or incomplete. If you can provide relevant data, please, write on the talk page.
|
|