As of August 2024, International Journal "Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets" is being indexed in Scopus.
Please check our Instructions to Authors and send your manuscripts to nifs.journal@gmail.com. Next issue: September/October 2024.

Open Call for Papers: International Workshop on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets • 13 December 2024 • Banska Bystrica, Slovakia/ online (hybrid mode).
Deadline for submissions: 16 November 2024.

Issue:A new similarity measure and new distances for intuitionistic fuzzy sets

From Ifigenia, the wiki for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and generalized nets
Jump to navigation Jump to search
shortcut
http://ifigenia.org/wiki/issue:nifs/15/4/33-39
Title of paper: A new similarity measure and new distances for intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Author(s):
Radoslav Tzvetkov
Technical University of Sofia, Boulevard Kliment Ohridski 8 Sofia, Bulgaria
rado_tzv@tu-sofia.bg
Eulalia Szmidt
Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Newelska 6, 01-447 Warsaw, Poland
szmidt@ibspan.waw.pl
Janusz Kacprzyk
Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Newelska 6, 01-447 Warsaw, Poland
kacprzyk@ibspan.waw.pl
Presented at: 5th International Workshop on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 19 October 2009, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Published in: Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Volume 15, Number 4, pages 33—39
Download:  PDF (80  Kb, File info)
Abstract: This paper is a continuation of our previous works on similarity measures of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets (to be called A-IFSs, for short). The similarity measures we considered used all three functions (membership, non-membership and hesitation) to represent A-IFSs, and examined two kinds of distances – one to an object to be compared, and one to its complement. In this paper we propose some new distances between A-IFSs, and new similarity measures preserving all the advantages of the previously proposed similarity measures and using the new distance functions.


References:
  1. Atanassov K. (1983), Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. VII ITKR Session. Sofia (Centr. Sci.-Techn. Libr. of Bulg. Acad. of Sci., 1697/84) (in Bulgarian).
  2. Atanassov K. (1999), Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Springer-Verlag.
  3. Bouchon-Meunier B., Rifgi M., and Bothorel S. (1996). General measures of comparison of objects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84 (2), 143–153.
  4. Chen S., Yeh M. and Hsiao P. (1995). A comparison of similarity measures of fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,72 (1), 79–89.
  5. Cross V. and Sudkamp T. (2002) Similarity and Compatibility in Fuzzy Set Theory. Assessment and Applications. (Series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing). Physica-Verlag.
  6. Dengfeng L. and Chuntian C. (2002) New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognition Letters, 23, 221-225.
  7. Pappis C., and Karacapilidis N. (1993). A comparative assessment of measures of similarity of fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 56, 171–174.
  8. Szmidt E. and Baldwin J. (2003) New similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and mass assignment theory. Notes on IFSs, 9 (3), 60–76.
  9. Szmidt E. and Baldwin J. (2004) Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and mass assignment theory. Notes on IFSs, 10, (3), 15-28.
  10. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (1996c) Remarks on some applications of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in decision making, Notes on IFS, 2 (3), 22–31.
  11. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2000) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114 (3), 505–518.
  12. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2000) On Measures on Consensus Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations. IPMU 2000, 1454–1461.
  13. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2001) Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118 (3), 467–477.
  14. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2002a) Analysis of Agreement in a Group of Experts via Distances Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preferences. Proc. IPMU’2002, Annecy, 1859–1865.
  15. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2002). An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Base Approach to Intelligent Data Analysis (an application to medical diagnosis). In A. Abraham, L. Jain, J. Kacprzyk (Eds.): Recent Advances in Intelligent Paradigms and Applications. Springer-Verlag, 57–70.
  16. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2002c) Evaluation of Agreement in a Group of Experts via Distances Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Proc. IEEE-IS’2002 – Int. IEEE Symposium: Intelligent Systems, Varna, 166–170.
  17. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2004) Similarity of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the Jaccard coefficient. IPMU 2004, 1405–1412.
  18. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (2004) A Concept of Similarity for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and its use in Group Decision Making. 2004 IEEE Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, Budapest, 1129–1134.
  19. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2005) A New Concept of a Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and its Use in Group Decision Making. In V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, S. Miyamoto (Eds.): Modelling Decisions for AI. LNAI 3558, Springer, 272–282.
  20. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2006) Distances Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Straightforward Approaches may not work. 3rd Int. IEEE Conf. ”Intelligent Systems”, 716–721.
  21. Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2007). A New Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Straightforward Approaches may not work. 2007 IEEE Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, 481–486.
  22. Tasseva V., Szmidt E. and Kacprzyk J. (2005) On one of the geometrical interpretations of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Notes on IFS, 11 (3), 21–27.
  23. Tversky A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev., 84, 327–352.
  24. Veltkamp R.C. (2001) Shape matching: similarity measures and algorithms. Proc. Shape Modelling International, Genova, Italy, IEEE Press, 188–197.
  25. Wang X., De Baets B., and Kerre E. (1995). A comparative study of similarity measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 73 (2), 259–268.
  26. Zeng W. and H. Li (2006) Relationship between similarity measure and entropy of interval valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 1477–1484.
  27. Zwick R., Carlstein E., Budescu D. (1987).Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis. Int. J. of Approx. Reasoning, 1, 221–242.
Citations:

The list of publications, citing this article may be empty or incomplete. If you can provide relevant data, please, write on the talk page.