Call for Papers for the 27th International Conference on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets is now open!
Conference: 5–6 July 2024, Burgas, Bulgaria • EXTENDED DEADLINE for submissions: 15 APRIL 2024.
Conference: 5–6 July 2024, Burgas, Bulgaria • EXTENDED DEADLINE for submissions: 15 APRIL 2024.
Issue:Interpreting the results of InterCriteria Analysis: Pareto principle at work: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| format = PDF | | format = PDF | ||
| size = 248 | | size = 248 | ||
| abstract = The present short note aims to propose a new, alternative, way to interpret the results of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets-based method for multicriteria decision support named InterCriteria Analysis. Given an <math>m \times n</math> dataset of multiple (''m'') objects evaluated numerically against multiple (''n'') criteria, the ICA method generates an <math>n \times n</math> table of intuitionistic fuzzy pairs <math>\langle \mu_{i,j}, \nu_{i,j} \rangle, \ i, j \in {1, 2, \ldots, n}</math> where the given pair indicates the extent of relation between the corresponding pair of criteria <math>C_i, C_j</math>. Traditionally, the interpretation of these intuitionistic fuzzy pairs regarding the extent of positive or negative dependence between two criteria (or, respectively, the lack of such) requires that two threshold values, both in the [0,1] interval too, are used. Now we propose to use only one such threshold value belonging to the [0,1] interval, for instance a minimal threshold of the degree of membership, while the other threshold | | abstract = The present short note aims to propose a new, alternative, way to interpret the results of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets-based method for multicriteria decision support named InterCriteria Analysis. Given an <math>m \times n</math> dataset of multiple (''m'') objects evaluated numerically against multiple (''n'') criteria, the ICA method generates an <math>n \times n</math> table of intuitionistic fuzzy pairs <math>\langle \mu_{i,j}, \nu_{i,j} \rangle, \ i, j \in {1, 2, \ldots, n}</math> where the given pair indicates the extent of relation between the corresponding pair of criteria <math>C_i, C_j</math>. Traditionally, the interpretation of these intuitionistic fuzzy pairs regarding the extent of positive or negative dependence between two criteria (or, respectively, the lack of such) requires that two threshold values, both in the [0,1] interval too, are used. Now we propose to use only one such threshold value belonging to the [0,1] interval, for instance a minimal threshold of the degree of membership, while the other threshold would be essentially related to the size of the subset of intercriteria pairs being shortlisted for interpretation, rather than their degree of non-membership. We justify that the proposed approach, inspired by the Pareto Principle, in certain cases yields better results than the traditionally used one. | ||
| keywords = Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, InterCriteria Analysis, Pareto Principle, Power law. | | keywords = Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, InterCriteria Analysis, Pareto Principle, Power law. | ||
| ams = 03E72. | | ams = 03E72. |
Latest revision as of 00:24, 15 December 2023
shortcut
|
|