Please check our Instructions to Authors and send your manuscripts to nifs.journal@gmail.com.
Issue:Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretation of a classical formula: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m . |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| format = PDF | | format = PDF | ||
| size = 179 | | size = 179 | ||
| abstract = The formula <math>\neg A = (A \rightarrow ((A \rightarrow A) \wedge \neg (A \rightarrow A)))</math> is a tautology in the classical propositional logic. In this paper, we determine all intuitionistic fuzzy implications that satisfy this formula together with the classical intuitionistic fuzzy negation or with the negation generated by this implication | | abstract = The formula <math>\neg A = (A \rightarrow ((A \rightarrow A) \wedge \neg (A \rightarrow A)))</math> is a tautology in the classical propositional logic. In this paper, we determine all intuitionistic fuzzy implications that satisfy this formula together with the classical intuitionistic fuzzy negation or with the negation generated by this implication. | ||
| keywords = Intuitionistic fuzzy implication, Intuitionistic fuzzy negation, Tautology. | | keywords = Intuitionistic fuzzy implication, Intuitionistic fuzzy negation, Tautology. | ||
| ams = 03E72. | | ams = 03E72. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
# Atanassova, L. (2014). Remark on the intuitionistic fuzzy forms of two classical logic axioms. Part 1. Annual of the “Informatics” Section, Union of Scientists in Bulgaria, 7, 24–27. | # Atanassova, L. (2014). Remark on the intuitionistic fuzzy forms of two classical logic axioms. Part 1. Annual of the “Informatics” Section, Union of Scientists in Bulgaria, 7, 24–27. | ||
# Atanassova, L. (2014). [[Issue:Remark on the intuitionistic fuzzy forms of two classical logic axioms. Part 2|Remark on the intuitionistic fuzzy forms of two classical logic axioms. Part 2]]. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 20(4), 10–13. | # Atanassova, L. (2014). [[Issue:Remark on the intuitionistic fuzzy forms of two classical logic axioms. Part 2|Remark on the intuitionistic fuzzy forms of two classical logic axioms. Part 2]]. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 20(4), 10–13. | ||
# Michalíková, A., Szmidt, E., & Vassilev, P. (2021). [[Issue: | # Michalíková, A., Szmidt, E., & Vassilev, P. (2021). [[Issue:Modifications_of_Łukasiewicz's_intuitionistic_fuzzy_implication|Modifications_of_Łukasiewicz's_intuitionistic_fuzzy_implication]]. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 27(3), 32–39. | ||
# Nakamatsu, K. (2008). The paraconsistent annotated logic program EVALPSN and its application. In: Fulcher, J., & Jain, L. (Eds.). Computational Intelligence: A Compendium. Springer, Berlin, 233–306. | # Nakamatsu, K. (2008). The paraconsistent annotated logic program EVALPSN and its application. In: Fulcher, J., & Jain, L. (Eds.). Computational Intelligence: A Compendium. Springer, Berlin, 233–306. | ||
# Vassilev, P., Ribagin, S., & Kacprzyk, J. (2018). [[Issue:A remark on intuitionistic fuzzy implications|A remark on intuitionistic fuzzy implications]]. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 24(2), 1–7. | # Vassilev, P., Ribagin, S., & Kacprzyk, J. (2018). [[Issue:A remark on intuitionistic fuzzy implications|A remark on intuitionistic fuzzy implications]]. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 24(2), 1–7. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:23, 30 November 2025
shortcut
|
|