Please check our Instructions to Authors and send your manuscripts to nifs.journal@gmail.com. Next issue: September/October 2024.
Deadline for submissions: 16 November 2024.
Talk:Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
answer |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For the definition, I think it would be better if the intuitionistic fuzzy set is denoted by <math>A^{*}</math> or <math> \hat{A}</math> to stress that this set, though it depends on <math> A </math>, is different from it. Then it may be stated that in order to avoid cumbersome notation we will further use simply <math> A </math> when referring IFS. | == For the definition == | ||
For the definition, I think it would be better if the intuitionistic fuzzy set is denoted by <math>A^{*}</math> or <math> \hat{A}</math> to stress that this set, though it depends on <math> A </math>, is different from it. Then it may be stated that in order to avoid cumbersome notation we will further use simply <math> A </math> when referring IFS. --[[User:Peter Vassilev|Peter Vassilev]], 10:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I corrected and added comments on the notation and definition. Is it clearer now? --[[User:Krassimir Atanassov|Krassimir Atanassov]] 09:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:43, 9 November 2008
For the definition
For the definition, I think it would be better if the intuitionistic fuzzy set is denoted by [math]\displaystyle{ A^{*} }[/math] or [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{A} }[/math] to stress that this set, though it depends on [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math], is different from it. Then it may be stated that in order to avoid cumbersome notation we will further use simply [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] when referring IFS. --Peter Vassilev, 10:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I corrected and added comments on the notation and definition. Is it clearer now? --Krassimir Atanassov 09:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)