Submit your research to the International Journal "Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets". Contact us at nifs.journal@gmail.com
Call for Papers for the 27th International Conference on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets is now open!
Conference: 5–6 July 2024, Burgas, Bulgaria • EXTENDED DEADLINE for submissions: 15 APRIL 2024.

Issue:Evaluating the performance of catalyst and feedstocks in the fluid catalytic cracking process: Application of InterCriteria Analysis with weight coefficients of the objects

From Ifigenia, the wiki for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and generalized nets
Jump to navigation Jump to search
shortcut
http://ifigenia.org/wiki/issue:nifs/29/2/166-177
Title of paper: Evaluating the performance of catalyst and feedstocks in the fluid catalytic cracking process: Application of InterCriteria Analysis with weight coefficients of the objects
Author(s):
Veselina Bureva
Intelligent Systems Laboratory, "Prof. Dr. Assen Zlatarov" University, 1 "Prof. Yakimov" Blvd., Burgas 8010, Bulgaria
vbureva@btu.bg
Krassimir Atanassov
Department of BioInformatics and Mathematical Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 105 "Acad. Georgi Bonchev" Str., Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
Intelligent Systems Laboratory, "Prof. Dr. Assen Zlatarov" University, 1 "Prof. Yakimov" Blvd., Burgas 8010, Bulgaria
krat@bas.bg
Yana Mersinkova
Department “Technology of Water”, “Prof. Dr. Asen Zlatarov” University, 1 "Prof. Yakimov" Blvd., Burgas 8010, Bulgaria
yanna@abv.bg
Dicho Stratiev
LUKOIL Neftohim Burgas, Burgas 8104, Bulgaria
Department of BioInformatics and Mathematical Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 105 "Acad. Georgi Bonchev" Str., Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
stratiev.dicho@neftochim.bg
Presented at: 26th International Conference on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Sofia, 26—27 June 2023
Published in: Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Volume 29 (2023), Number 2, pages 166–177
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7546/nifs.2023.29.2.166-177
Download:  PDF (1154  Kb, Info)
Abstract: In the current investigation an evaluation of the performance of catalyst and feedstocks in the fluid catalytic cracking process is proposed. An application of the newly modified method of InterCriteria Analysis—with weight coefficients of the objects—is performed. The obtained results are discussed in the light of a comparison with the standard ICrA.
Keywords: Intercriteria analysis, Index matrix, Intuitionistic fuzzy set, Fluid catalytic cracking.
AMS Classification: 03E72.
References:
  1. Atanassov, K. (1987). Generalized index matrices. Comptes rendus de l’Academie Bulgare des Sciences, 40(11), 15–18.
  2. Atanassov, K. (1999). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
  3. Atanassov, K. (2014). Index Matrices: Towards an Augmented Matrix Calculus. Springer, Cham.
  4. Atanassov, K., Mavrov, D., & Atanassova, V. (2014). Intercriteria decision making: A new approach for multicriteria decision making, based on index matrices and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Issues in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Generalized Nets, 11, 1–8.
  5. Atanassov, K., Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J. (2013). On intuitionistic fuzzy pairs. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 19(3), 1–13
Citations:
  1. Atanassov, K. (2012). On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory. Springer, Berlin.
  2. Atanassov, K. (2014). Index Matrices: Towards an Augmented Matrix Calculus. Studies in Computational Intelligence Series, Vol. 573, Springer, Cham.
  3. Atanassov, K., Atanassova, V., & Gluhchev, G. (2015). InterCriteria Analysis: Ideas and problems. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 21(1), 81–88.
  4. Atanassova, V., Doukovska, L., Michalikova, A., & Radeva, I. (2016). Intercriteria analysis: From pairs to triples. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 22(5), 98–110.
  5. Atanassov, K., Mavrov, D., & Atanassova, V. (2014). InterCriteria decision making: A new approach for multicriteria decision making, based on index matrices and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Issues in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Generalized Nets, 11, 1–8.
  6. Atanassov, K., Mavrov, D., & Atanassova, V. (2023). InterCriteria Analysis with weight coefficients of objects or criteria. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 29(2), 157–165.
  7. Bai, P., Etim, U. J., Yan, Z., Mintova, S., Zhang, Z., Zhong, Z., & Gao, X. (2019). Fluid catalytic cracking technology: Current status and recent discoveries on catalyst contamination. Catalysis Reviews, 61(3), 333–405.
  8. Chorukova, E., Marinov, P., & Umlenski, I. (2021). Survey on theory and applications of InterCriteria Analysis approach. In: Atanassov, K.T. (Ed.). Research in Computer Science in the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 934, 453–469. Springer, Cham.
  9. Gray, M. (2020). Whatsoever things are true: Hypothesis, artefact, and bias in chemical engineering research. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. First published: 14 August 2020 [Correction added on 13 March 2021, after first online publication: Peer review history statement has been added.]. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23863.
  10. Kaiser, M. J., De Klerk, A., Gary, J. H., & Handwerk, G. E. (2020). Petroleum Refining. Technology, Economics, and Markets (6th ed.), CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
  11. Kapustin, V. M. (1992). Regulation of phase transitions in catalytic processes for raw material processing. Doctor of Science Thesis, Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas, Moscow, Russia.
  12. Sadeghbeigi, R. (2020). Fluid Catalytic Cracking Handbook. An Expert Guide to the Practical Operation, Design, and Optimization of FCC Units. Elsevier: Cambridge, MA.177
  13. Stratiev, D., Dinkov, R., Tavlieva, M., Shishkova, I., Palichev, G. N., Ribagin, S., Atanassov, K., Stratiev, D. D., Nenov, S., Pilev, D., Sotirov, S., Sotirova, E., Simeonov, S., & Boyadzhieva, V. (2023). Correlations of HTSD to TBP and bulk properties to saturate content of a wide variety of crude oils. Processes, 11, Article ID 420.
  14. Stratiev, D., Ivanov, M., Chavdarov, I., Argirov, G., & Strovegli, G. (2023). Revamping fluid catalytic cracking unit, and optimizing catalyst to process heavier feeds. Applied Sciences, 13(3), Article ID 2017.
  15. Stratiev, D., Nenov, S., Shishkova, I., Georgiev, B., Argirov, G., Dinkov, R., Yordanov, D., Atanassova, V., Vassilev, P., & Atanassov, K. (2020). Commercial investigation of the ebullated bed vacuum residue hydrocracking in the conversion range 55-93%. ACS Omega, 51(5), Article ID 33290.
  16. Stratiev, D., Shishkova, I., Dinkov, R., Dobrev, D., Argirov, G., & Yordanov, D. (2022). The Synergy between Ebullated Bed Vacuum Residue Hydrocracking and Fluid Catalytic Cracking Processes in Modern Refining—Commercial Experience. “Professor Marin Drinov” Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  17. Wallenstein, D. (1998). Rational assessment of FCC catalyst performance by utilization of micro-activity testing. Applied Catalysis A: General, 167, 141–155.
  18. Wallenstein, D., & Alkemade, U. (1996). Modelling of selectivity data obtained from microactivity testing of FCC catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General. 137, 37–54.
  19. Wang, P. (2019). Research progress of intensified vacuum distillation for crude oil. Advances in Engineering Research, 2019, 181, 158–160.
  20. Zvyagin, V. O. (1993). Physicochemical technology of catalytic cracking in the presence of oxygen. PhD thesis, Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas, Moscow, Russia.

The list of publications, citing this article may be empty or incomplete. If you can provide relevant data, please, write on the talk page.

Retrieved from "https://ifigenia.org/index.php?title=Issue:Evaluating_the_performance_of_catalyst_and_feedstocks_in_the_fluid_catalytic_cracking_process:_Application_of_InterCriteria_Analysis_with_weight_coefficients_of_the_objects&oldid=11606"